I think we should make it clear to our users which components are
actively developed/supported and for which not to expect
enhancements/bugfixes.
I don't think long abandoned components are good for motivating folks to
contribute. Potential contributors just get frustrated if they get no
feedback on patches/pull request, because there is nobody there to
review. Just take a look a the pull requests for components with much
more recent releases. A lot are going unanswered because we lack the
time to review and provided adequate feedback.
Am 10.10.2017 um 20:38 schrieb Gary Gregory:
Sure, why not. In general, I'd rather leave components as they to give
folks the opportunity to contribute, but I won't stand in your way ;-)
Gary
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net>
wrote:
Hello everybody,
the last release of Proxy is from 2008.
I looks like attempts to release a 2.0 version were abandoned three and a
half year ago.
Maybe it is time to move the component to dormant?
What do you think?
-Pascal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
