On Oct 10, 2017 14:18, "Pascal Schumacher" <pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote:
I think we should make it clear to our users which components are actively developed/supported and for which not to expect enhancements/bugfixes. I don't think long abandoned components are good for motivating folks to contribute. Potential contributors just get frustrated if they get no feedback on patches/pull request, because there is nobody there to review. Just take a look a the pull requests for components with much more recent releases. A lot are going unanswered because we lack the time to review and provided adequate feedback. Sounds good. Gary Am 10.10.2017 um 20:38 schrieb Gary Gregory: > Sure, why not. In general, I'd rather leave components as they to give > folks the opportunity to contribute, but I won't stand in your way ;-) > > Gary > > On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Pascal Schumacher < > pascalschumac...@gmx.net> > wrote: > > Hello everybody, >> >> the last release of Proxy is from 2008. >> >> I looks like attempts to release a 2.0 version were abandoned three and a >> half year ago. >> >> Maybe it is time to move the component to dormant? >> >> What do you think? >> >> -Pascal >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
