I can't find that package on debian's package search page. I'm not sure if
they package it there (it's a go program, so it's pretty easy to install if
you have go already). Here's the official site: https://hub.github.com/

On 15 March 2018 at 10:19, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:

> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:27:38 -0500, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
>> When you have a GitHub origin, you can checkout pulls/42/head to check out
>> PR#42. You can pull/merge from that branch as well to merge the PR (by
>> committing and pushing that merge, GitHub will notice and mark the PR as
>> merged). You can also use the "hub" command line tool that GitHub
>> publishes
>> which adds a bunch of convenience commands to do the same thing.
>>
>
> Following your hint, I've installed (Debian) a package named
> "git-hub"; assuming this is the tool.
>
> Now, I'll need the link to Gimo's "forked" repository of the
> "Commons Statistics" GitHub mirror...
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
>
> On 14 March 2018 at 10:19, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:16:42 +0000, Otto Fowler wrote:
>>>
>>> I should be more specific, this is for looking at github pr’s.
>>>> So if your submitters are forking, submitting prs on github.
>>>>
>>>> We also have scripts for committing, but we are doing git -> github
>>>> mirror
>>>>
>>>>
>>> My knowledge of "git" is small; my knowledge of GitHub smaller
>>> (and zero for functionalities that require being logged in). :-}
>>>
>>> Assuming a "git" repository (where "origin" is on an Apache server)
>>> with a local "clone" (i.e. on my machine), is it possible to create
>>> a branch, say "gimo_work", such that
>>>
>>>  $ git checkout gimo_work
>>>  $ git ... ? ... (equivalent to "pull" wrt "origin")
>>>
>>> will retrieve the latest Gimo's commits on the fork made
>>> from the Apache repository?
>>>
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>> On March 14, 2018 at 10:15:04, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com)
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We have script to help reviewers checkout PR’s in git, either in their
>>>> own
>>>> repo
>>>> or just doing it in ~/tmp or something into a new repo.
>>>>
>>>> So, I would run:
>>>>
>>>> checkout-pr 999
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> in the tmp directory, and end up with a local version that I can then
>>>> build
>>>> and do whatever with.
>>>> would that help?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On March 14, 2018 at 10:08:47, Gilles (gil...@harfang.homelinux.org)
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:43:17 -0400, ajs6f wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 13, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't find it very easy to cooperate with developers who fork on
>>>>>> GitHub and submit PRs. I've now found the "git" command that creates a
>>>>>> branch from a PR, but it would be so much more comfortable to just
>>>>>> switch directory and do "git pull".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just as a point of information, it is possible to reverse the Github
>>>>> <- Apache mirroring most projects use to be Github -> Apache.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> It seems that a good-enough-for-me solution would be to "clone"
>>>> (on my local system) the repository forked by the GSoC participant.
>>>>
>>>> Does it make sense?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Gilles
>>>>
>>>> What
>>>>
>>>>> that means is that merging PRs from Github becomes one click in the
>>>>> Github UI.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are other consequences, of course, especially related to other
>>>>> integrations Commons may be using (e.g. integration between Github
>>>>> and
>>>>> JIRA).
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, INFRA are the folks to talk to if this sounds interesting.
>>>>> At Apache Jena, we looked into it but have taken no action because we
>>>>> still have some open questions about when some of our workflow
>>>>> integrations will become possible with "reversed mirroring".
>>>>>
>>>>> Adam Soroka ; aj...@apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to