On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 16:26, Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote: > > (please make sure to add me to CC directly as the mailing is presently broken) > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 00:47, Mark Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > -1 > > > > Changing the reply-to configuration increases the chances of message > > threads being moved off-list by accident. I am concerned about the risk > > of harm to the community that that represents. > > Can you present any evidence that this would be actively harmful to > the community to point that we should violate internet standards? > I've seen nothing similar happen in any of other open source > communities I'm a part of.
>From my reading of RFC 2822, it's perfectly legitimate to provide a Reply-To address to override the From: address. In any case, we definitely need the Reply-To header for lists such as commits, issues, notifications. If we were to change only dev@ etc, then the behaviour on those lists would be different - that seems confusing to me. > -- > Eitan Adler > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
