Projects that have a configure script usually include that in the source
distribution but not in the source repository (at least for autotools
users).

On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 17:41, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 at 17:42, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 28/09/2019 17:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 12:04 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I can confirm that if I delete all of:
> > >>
> > >> src\native\windows\apps\prunmgr\WINXP_X86_GUI_RELEASE
> > >> src\native\windows\apps\prunsrv\WINXP_X86_EXE_RELEASE
> > >> src\native\windows\apps\prunsrv\WINXP_X64_EXE_RELEASE
> > >>
> > >> I can build without errors but with warnings:
> > >>
> > >> .\..\..\apps\prunsrv\prunsrv.c(323): warning C4996: '_wfopen': This
> > >> function or variable may be unsafe. Consider using _wfopen_s instead.
> To
> > >> disable deprecation, use _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS. See online help for
> > >> details.
> > >> C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows
> > >> Kits\10\include\10.0.17763.0\ucrt\corecrt_wstdio.h(130): note: see
> > >> declaration of '_wfopen'
> > >> .\..\..\apps\prunsrv\prunsrv.c(347): warning C4996: '_wfopen': This
> > >> function or variable may be unsafe. Consider using _wfopen_s instead.
> To
> > >> disable deprecation, use _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS. See online help for
> > >> details.
> > >> C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows
> > >> Kits\10\include\10.0.17763.0\ucrt\corecrt_wstdio.h(130): note: see
> > >> declaration of '_wfopen'
> > >> .\..\..\apps\prunsrv\prunsrv.c(1339): warning C4996: '_snprintf': This
> > >> function or variable may be unsafe. Consider using _snprintf_s
> instead. To
> > >> disable deprecation, use _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS. See online help for
> > >> details.
> > >> C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows
> > >> Kits\10\include\10.0.17763.0\ucrt\stdio.h(1961): note: see
> declaration of
> > >> '_snprintf'
> > >> .\..\..\apps\prunsrv\prunsrv.c(1341): warning C4996: '_snprintf': This
> > >> function or variable may be unsafe. Consider using _snprintf_s
> instead. To
> > >> disable deprecation, use _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS. See online help for
> > >> details.
> > >> C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows
> > >> Kits\10\include\10.0.17763.0\ucrt\stdio.h(1961): note: see
> declaration of
> > >> '_snprintf'
> > >>         rc /l 0x409 /d "NDEBUG" /i ".\..\..\include" /fo
> > >> WINXP_X86_EXE_RELEASE\prunsrv.res .\..\../apps/prunsrv/prunsrv.rc
> > >>
> > >
> > > FWIW, using:
> > >
> > > Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.21.27702.2 for x86
> > > Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.
> >
> > Since I am going to re-tag for an RC2 (see below) I'll see what I can do
> > to clean up those warnings.
> >
> > >> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 11:53 AM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 10:03 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 at 13:39, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> >
> > <snip/>
> >
> > >>>>> It seems we should NOT deliver the following folders in the src zip
> > >>>> which
> > >>>>> now contain objs and exes:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> src\native\windows\apps\prunmgr\WINXP_X86_GUI_RELEASE
> > >>>>> src\native\windows\apps\prunsrv\WINXP_X86_EXE_RELEASE
> > >>>>> src\native\windows\apps\prunsrv\WINXP_X64_EXE_RELEASE
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> WDYT?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Looks like the build created the files in the wrong directories?
> >
> > They should not be present in the source zip. I normally build the
> > binaries from the same tag but in a completely different checkout to
> > avoid this sort of thing. I'll see if I can figure out what I did wrong
> > but regardless of whether I can or not, I'll cancel this release, update
> > the estimated release date, re-tag and start an RC2 vote.
> >
> > I'll also take a brief look at whether I can exclude those directories
> > explicitly from the source build to avoid this issue in future although
> > my Maven foo may not be up to that.
> >
>
> Why not create them in a different output directory under target?
>
> > >>>> The src zip also contains:
> > >>>> src/native/unix/configure
> > >>>> AIUI this is a generated file; I would expect it to be in the binary
> > >>>> artifact, if anywhere
> >
> > No. The configure script is generated but it *is* meant to be in the
> > source distribution. Without it, building from source is more difficult.
> > I forgot this for the 1.2.0 release and there were complaints as a
> result.
>
> Is the config file OS and version  independent?
> If not, then it might be confusing.
>
> Why is it not in the Git repo?
>
> > >>>> Also there are some Git files missing from the src zip.
> > >>>> Not sure if that is intentional?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> CONTRIBUTING.md
> > >>>> HOWTO-RELEASE.txt
> > >>>> README.md
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I certainly would expect CONTRIBUTING.md and README.md to be in the
> src
> > >>> zip, not quite a blocker for me. I am more concerned that we are
> including
> > >>> all of these OBJ and EXE files.
> >
> > The .md files are generated but I agree they should be in the source
> > distribution. I'll see about getting them added.
> >
> > The HOWTO_RELEASE.txt is perhaps more debatable but on balance I think
> > it should be there too.
>
> Does no harm, and makes it easier to compare source tag with source bundle.
>
> > Mark
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
> --
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to