Hi Gilles, Are you suggesting skipping another beta version and having numbers 1.0 and geometry 1.0 be the next releases? I could get on board with that. It would be great to have an official release of these. What needs to be done on numbers before we're ready for 1.0 (aside from moving over some code from geometry)?
On another note, I don't feel like the enclosing and hull modules in geometry are quite ready for prime time yet. So, I would leave those out of 1.0. Regards, Matt ________________________________ From: Gilles Sadowski <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 12:37 PM To: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [geometry] 1.0-beta2 Hello Matt. Le lun. 19 avr. 2021 à 15:20, Matt Juntunen <[email protected]> a écrit : > > I'd like to release commons-geometry 1.0-beta2 within the next couple of > weeks. I'm planning on including GEOMETRY-118 (additional methods for > transform matrix classes) in that if possible. Is there anything else anyone > would like to include? Thanks a lot for your work on [Geometry]. Could we perhaps make progress with the issue of what code can be moved to [Numbers]? Rationale is that some project might be unwilling to allow "beta" code in its dependencies (if just because there is the risk JAR hell, which we explicitly permit in beta releases). Since it isn't likely that additional feedback will come about the beta components, it would be good to plan for an "official" release of [Numbers] and [Geometry], in that order. [It's not mandatory to include all modules.] WDYT? Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
