> On May 5, 2021, at 6:38 AM, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Le mar. 4 mai 2021 à 02:49, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> a écrit :
>> 
>> I apologize. I started another thread regarding the vote before seeing this.
> 
> No problem.
> 
>> Maybe that will get more attention?
> 
> It doesn't seem so. :-}
> 
> IMHO, valid answers have been given to the statements/questions
> from people who didn't vote +1.
> The very low turnout makes the arithmetics of the result fairly subjective...
> 
> The optimistic view is that
>  1. most people don't care (that the repository is created),
>  2. there is no reason to doubt the infos provided by actual users of
> those codes,
>  3. there is an embryo of a community (perhaps not viable, but only
> the future can tell...),[1]
>  4. the same kind of welcoming gestures should apply for the proposed
> contributions, as for the attempt to resuscitate "Commons Graph"[2],
> even if some of the PMC might arguably prefer another option.

Regardless, following https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html 
<https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> indicates that this vote is not 
going to pass. 
You can’t assert lazy consensus on an explicit vote.  If you had started this 
as a lazy consensus vote it 
is likely it would have still gotten a -1 vote since both Sebb and Emmanuel 
have voice opposition.

Ralph

Reply via email to