Am 05.05.21 um 21:54 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 20:33, Oliver Heger
<oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> a écrit :
Am 05.05.21 um 20:26 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a écrit :
IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component
That's certainly true.
And nobody is forced to do anything.
When the other CM spin-offs started, there was only _one_ person
willing to do the work.
What about the sandbox? IIUC, every committer can start a new component
there. If then a community forms around this component, it can move to
proper (which would then require a vote).
Would this be an option to get started?
[Graph] is listed in the sandbox[1], yet when someone expressed a willingness
to contribute, we had a "git" repository created[2] (even though the
web site has
remained outdated[3], probably because the attempt was short-lived).
So indeed, I could have already created the repository a few weeks ago...
However in this instance, what would it mean to have codes that have lived
within a "proper" component for 6 years and more be moved to "sandbox"?
A way to move forward?
Oliver
Regards,
Gilles
[1] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/commons-graph/
[2] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-graph.git
[3] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/commons-graph/source-repository.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
