Le mer. 21 juil. 2021 à 00:35, Matt Juntunen <matt.a.juntu...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Geometry only uses rng for tests and performance benchmarks. Why do we > need to wait for the next release?
We don't need to; it's for self-advertisement. ;-) There is largely enough new functionality in [RNG] for justifying a release and it would just make more sense to make that one first... Gilles > > -Matt J > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:56 PM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > Le mar. 20 juil. 2021 à 04:01, Matt Juntunen > > <matt.a.juntu...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > commons-numbers 1.0 has now been released so I'd like to release > > > commons-geometry 1.0 soon. I was going to include the following > > > modules: > > > - commons-geometry-core > > > - commons-geometry-euclidean > > > - commons-geometry-spherical > > > - commons-geometry-io-core > > > - commons-geometry-io-euclidean > > > > > > If there are no objections, I could try to get an RC out this weekend. > > > > I'd suggest that [RNG] (v1.4) be released first so that [Geometry] > > can depend on it. > > > > Also, there was an issue raised recently about what to do with the > > "examples" code. Should it be part of the released artefacts? > > > > Best, > > Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
