Hello again! Please ignore my request about checking whether I have signed the agreement. I will have to do it once again since my information has changed.
Sorry for spamming. Best regards, rodde ________________________________ Lähettäjä: Efremov, Rodion <[email protected]> Lähetetty: lauantai 6. joulukuuta 2025 15.37 Vastaanottaja: sebb <[email protected]>; Commons Developers List <[email protected]> Aihe: Vs: [COLLECTIONS] JMH benchmark results for IndexedLinkedList vs. ExtendedTreeList Hello! My bad. Could you try that one: [email protected] ? Best regards, rodde ________________________________ Lähettäjä: sebb <[email protected]> Lähetetty: lauantai 6. joulukuuta 2025 15.10 Vastaanottaja: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> Aihe: Re: [COLLECTIONS] JMH benchmark results for IndexedLinkedList vs. ExtendedTreeList On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 at 13:04, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 7:41 AM Efremov, Rodion > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello Gary, > > > > As far as I recall, I have already signed the agreement years ago. > > Hi rodde, > > If you used [email protected] in your paperwork, we don't > have it. Did you use a different email address? If you don't wish to reveal the email address on this list, feel free to send it to the commons private list instead of dev > Gary > > > > > Best regards, > > rodde > > ________________________________ > > Lähettäjä: Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > > Lähetetty: lauantai 6. joulukuuta 2025 13.28 > > Vastaanottaja: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> > > Aihe: Re: [COLLECTIONS] JMH benchmark results for IndexedLinkedList vs. > > ExtendedTreeList > > > > Hello Rodion, > > > > I think we need you to sign a Contributor Agreement before we can proceed > > with your contribution. Please see > > https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html > > > > Thank you! > > Gary > > > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2025, 02:33 Efremov, Rodion <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, community! > > > > > > In the attachments, you may find a text file summarizing the JMH benchmark > > > of my IndexedLinkedList vs. ExtendedTreeList [1]. It turned out that my > > > list implementation easily outperforms [1]. > > > > > > What do you think? Should I do a PR? > > > > > > References: > > > [1] > > > https://github.com/coderodde/IndexedLinkedList/blob/main/src/main/java/io/github/coderodde/util/ExtendedTreeList.java > > > > > > PS. ExtendedTreeList is a subclass of TreeList that implements some > > > essential missing methods such as subList(..., ...).clear() and so on. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
