On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 8:50 AM Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 8:38 AM Efremov, Rodion > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > My bad. Could you try that one: > > > > [email protected] > > Yep, that one works. Thank you. I'll run the benchmarks later today.
Oh, wait, I'm confusing this thread with another. Where are the benchmarks? It should be simpler to create a PR at this point. Thank you, Gary > > Gary > > > > > ? > > > > Best regards, > > rodde > > ________________________________ > > Lähettäjä: sebb <[email protected]> > > Lähetetty: lauantai 6. joulukuuta 2025 15.10 > > Vastaanottaja: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> > > Aihe: Re: [COLLECTIONS] JMH benchmark results for IndexedLinkedList vs. > > ExtendedTreeList > > > > On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 at 13:04, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 7:41 AM Efremov, Rodion > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Gary, > > > > > > > > As far as I recall, I have already signed the agreement years ago. > > > > > > Hi rodde, > > > > > > If you used [email protected] in your paperwork, we don't > > > have it. Did you use a different email address? > > > > If you don't wish to reveal the email address on this list, feel free > > to send it to the commons private list instead of dev > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > rodde > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Lähettäjä: Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > > > > Lähetetty: lauantai 6. joulukuuta 2025 13.28 > > > > Vastaanottaja: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> > > > > Aihe: Re: [COLLECTIONS] JMH benchmark results for IndexedLinkedList vs. > > > > ExtendedTreeList > > > > > > > > Hello Rodion, > > > > > > > > I think we need you to sign a Contributor Agreement before we can > > > > proceed > > > > with your contribution. Please see > > > > https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2025, 02:33 Efremov, Rodion <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, community! > > > > > > > > > > In the attachments, you may find a text file summarizing the JMH > > > > > benchmark > > > > > of my IndexedLinkedList vs. ExtendedTreeList [1]. It turned out that > > > > > my > > > > > list implementation easily outperforms [1]. > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? Should I do a PR? > > > > > > > > > > References: > > > > > [1] > > > > > https://github.com/coderodde/IndexedLinkedList/blob/main/src/main/java/io/github/coderodde/util/ExtendedTreeList.java > > > > > > > > > > PS. ExtendedTreeList is a subclass of TreeList that implements some > > > > > essential missing methods such as subList(..., ...).clear() and so on. > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
