Github user stain commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-commonsrdf/pull/25#discussion_r85502041
  
    --- Diff: api/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/api/RDFTermFactory.java 
---
    @@ -17,262 +17,61 @@
      */
     package org.apache.commons.rdf.api;
     
    -import java.io.Serializable;
    -import java.util.Locale;
    -
     /**
    - * Factory for creating RDFTerm and Graph instances.
    - * <p>
    - * It is not specified how an implementation should provide a 
RDFTermFactory.
    - * <p>
    - * If an implementation does not support a particular method (e.g. it 
requires
    - * additional parameters or can't create graphs), then it MAY throw
    - * {@link UnsupportedOperationException}, as provided by the 
<code>default</code>
    - * implementations in this interface.
    + * Factory for creating RDFTerm instances..
      * <p>
    - * If a factory method does not allow or support a provided parameter, e.g.
    - * because an IRI is considered invalid, then it SHOULD throw
    - * {@link IllegalArgumentException}.
    - *
    - * @see RDFTerm
    - * @see Graph
    - * @see Quad
    + * This interface is <strong>deprecated</strong> in favour of
    + * the richer {@link RDF}.
    + * 
    + * @see RDF
      */
    +@Deprecated
     public interface RDFTermFactory {
     
    -    /**
    -     * Create a new blank node.
    -     * <p>
    -     * The returned blank node MUST NOT be equal to any existing
    -     * {@link BlankNode} instances according to {@link 
BlankNode#equals(Object)}.
    -     *
    -     * @return A new, unique {@link BlankNode}
    -     * @throws UnsupportedOperationException
    -     *             If the operation is not supported.
    -     */
         default BlankNode createBlankNode() throws 
UnsupportedOperationException {
    --- End diff --
    
    Yes, I removed the notion of `UnsupporetedOperationException` from `RDF` as 
all our bundled implementations are complete and callers should not be too 
worried about that. 
    
    The Javadoc now say that any partial `RDF` implementations should be 
_clearly documented as such_:
    
    >  * A <em>partial RDF implementation</em> 
    >  * should be clearly documented as such, and may throw 
    >  * {@link UnsupportedOperationException} where applicable, e.g. if it 
    >  * does not support creating {@link Dataset}s or {@link Quad}s. 
    
    Is this sufficient? E.g. an `RDF` instance within OWLAPI probably would not 
know how to make a `Graph` or `Dataset` - but would be a bit more exotic 
factory than the ones bundled within Commons RDF.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to