The system gives us accept/reject rankings. If you want to communicate more than that, email me. Or call me. I want to have talk selections reflect the opinion of the subject experts.
-- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com On Jan 29, 2014 5:29 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <r...@apache.org> wrote: > Since this is my first time helping with the reviews, > I'm also wondering what's the objective for us > reviewers? Are we expected to stack-rank > the proposal in our given areas or weight them > somehow? > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As I am quite new to this process, a few questions -- > > > > The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications > will > > be sent out by Feb 14. So, what is the due date for completion of > reviews? > > > > There are a few submissions -- aside from some standard ASF presentations > > -- that are somewhat generic and don't directly apply to a specific > Apache > > project. So -- who will be reviewing these? Or should anybody that > > volunteered for reviewing, review them? > > > > Can more than one reviewer rate a submission and perhaps change the > > decision of a previous reviewer? Just curious about this. But it might be > > advantageous in some situations to get input from multiple reviewers. > > > > ok, that's it for now... > > > > -- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Kay Schenk, Apache OpenOffice > > > > "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, > > for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." > > -- James Mason >
