That's my understanding too. It should be easy enough to test this once i'm not in an airport any more.
-- Rich Bowen, mobile edition rbo...@rcbowen.com On Jan 31, 2014 3:30 AM, "Daniel Gruno" <rum...@cord.dk> wrote: > On 01/31/2014 06:31 AM, Rob Vesse wrote: > > Out of interest do the speakers see the specific comments individual > > reviewers post or are these aggregated/anonymised in some way? > > > > Rob > > As I understand it, speakers cannot see what reviewers write about a > talk, nor can you see what others write about your own talk if you are a > reviewer as well as a (potential) speaker. Rich may be able to clarify > when he gets back to a computer. > > With regards, > Daniel. > > > > > > On 30/01/2014 04:40, "Rich Bowen" <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > >> The system gives us accept/reject rankings. If you want to communicate > >> more > >> than that, email me. Or call me. I want to have talk selections reflect > >> the > >> opinion of the subject experts. > >> > >> -- > >> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com > >> > >> > >> On Jan 29, 2014 5:29 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <r...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Since this is my first time helping with the reviews, > >>> I'm also wondering what's the objective for us > >>> reviewers? Are we expected to stack-rank > >>> the proposal in our given areas or weight them > >>> somehow? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Roman. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> As I am quite new to this process, a few questions -- > >>>> > >>>> The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications > >>> will > >>>> be sent out by Feb 14. So, what is the due date for completion of > >>> reviews? > >>>> > >>>> There are a few submissions -- aside from some standard ASF > >>> presentations > >>>> -- that are somewhat generic and don't directly apply to a specific > >>> Apache > >>>> project. So -- who will be reviewing these? Or should anybody that > >>>> volunteered for reviewing, review them? > >>>> > >>>> Can more than one reviewer rate a submission and perhaps change the > >>>> decision of a previous reviewer? Just curious about this. But it > >>> might be > >>>> advantageous in some situations to get input from multiple reviewers. > >>>> > >>>> ok, that's it for now... > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> ------ > >> ----------------- > >>>> Kay Schenk, Apache OpenOffice > >>>> > >>>> "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, > >>>> for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." > >>>> -- James Mason > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
