On 30 April 2014 04:19, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > It's asked for approval on TM@, but AFAIK no approval has been granted. >
Meaning they got a denial, or simply no response ? In the latter case I can understand they cannot continue waiting. Looking at the agenda, and the people involved, it contains big asf projects and speakers who are asf members/committers. So maybe it would be more correct to turn it around, and ask TM@ to say if they have any objections. rgds jan I. > > --David > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > Are we aware of this event: http://apacheindia.org/ > > > > -- > > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon > > >
