ok, can we possibly rush through an approval?
--Rich
On 04/30/2014 08:17 AM, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:03 AM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote:
On 30 April 2014 04:19, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
It's asked for approval on TM@, but AFAIK no approval has been granted.
Meaning they got a denial, or simply no response ? In the latter case I can
understand they cannot continue waiting.
Looking at the agenda, and the people involved, it contains big asf
projects and speakers who are asf members/committers. So maybe it would be
more correct to turn it around, and ask TM@ to say if they have any
objections.
They've received a response; but they haven't received approval.
Admittedly my non-binding response was what has been received.
--David
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
