On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:57 PM Wade Chandler <wadechand...@apache.org> wrote: > > And mine was there is a line in this thread attacking the way a lot of very > inclusive people work here, and that line is like "your points have no > merit, but we'll make changes and drive them, that affect the whole org, > while using meritocracy while saying it is bad at lower levels", and in > this case it is everyone's concern even if they are not working on the > specific thing you are, because it impacts the whole/everyone working on > something at Apache, and is also directly related to my point on the > possibility to exist for overreach and overreaction considering that. > > Folks chose to throw around weight with various phrases such as "because > the President" and "policing". Where is the plan for what this looks like > given these mandates?
Slow down. It is impossible to keep up with the false accusations. >From your previous email " you're on the sidelines; the President said so"... to which I can only respond [citation needed]. If you want to react to an actual plan, I welcome your feedback on the following: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a5e7e30fad3e89547db554cf64b10d33611d4401356590bddf94b918@%3Cdev.community.apache.org%3E If you want to build your own plan to, feel free to do so. At the present time I can say that the link above is a plan that I can support. It doesn't start out with (or even mention) policing. It describes a plan that involves gathering data, analyzing results, and making recommendations. Nor does saying that I support and can see the ASF approving such a plan mean that we aren't capable of evaluating and supporting other plans. If you continue to want to attack proposals that absolutely nobody has made, I encourage you to do so elsewhere. > Wade - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
