On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:17 PM Ross Gardler <r...@gardler.me> wrote: > I think the problem is that *I* used the term "positive discrimination". That > has led to an interpretation of someone elses words through a cloudy lens. > Before making assumptions about that other persons intent you should listen > to their words. Have you watched Joan's presentation?
I read your words and asked you to elaborate on your intent because it seemed uncharacteristic/controversial, not because of the bearing on anyone else or other unspecified comments. Obviously you have no obligation to explain, but don't misrepresent my question or motives. It's insulting. > I'm not going to (intentionally) actively discriminate for or against anyone. > But I will protect your right, as an individual, to do so as long as you > protect my right to help you achieve the > right balance in our broader communities by stamping out the existence of any > discrimination (positive or negative). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
