On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 01:16:19PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >First, I feel like I have to respond given the Truman State University sig. >It's rare I run into other Truman grads in the wild, though we wouldn't >have crossed paths on campus... (1998 grad here...)
Wow, this is a first for me, too. Glad to see some fellow Truman grads in technology. >If the PRs appear here on this list, it makes it slightly easier to have a >discussion on list about the PRs. It also doesn't require people to go >upstream to subscribe to github or a second list. > >I wouldn't go so far as to say it's "unreasonable" to have a second list, I >just am not convinced it's desirable. > >As to the suggestion to discussing the PRs on the other list - then we have >to ask people to subscribe to both or miss some of the conversations about >the site development. Creating a filter for the GitBox notices + >subscribing to a new list are both about the same amount of work. If you >filter by sender or something like that you still can see discussions here >if anybody decides to go deeper on a specific commit. If you have to track >both lists, then that means a subset of the community is not going to see >those discussions either. (Either by omission or they just filter >everything and then see something six months later... ask me how I know...) That is true. I guess I am just used to having more mailing lists (I am mostly active on the Debian mailing lists) to choose from so that the mailing lists themselves act as filters. It's not a big deal to me either way; having a new mailing list or keeping it consolidated. Whatever the community decides I will go along with. It's not a battle I will choose to fight. -- Best regards, Brian T B.S. Computer Science 2014 (Truman State University) Minor Stasitics Minor Chemistry Minor Mathematics
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
