> On Dec 6, 2025, at 4:00 PM, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 6, 2025, at 15:41, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> IMO, the releases page [1] is misleading to users.
>>
>> It is not a valid download page, and does not link to proper download pages.
>>
>> I think it should be deleted,
>
> That works for me.
>
>> or at least the links and the reference
>> to downloads and verification should be removed.
>
> Alternatively, the links could link to a valid Project Download Page which
> would have to be maintained by the project.
I would suggest that you understand how projects.apache.org is maintained to
understand that the information for releases is voluntary and less than 75%
complete. Same with DOAP files.
> Alternatively, the links could be to a canonical
> <project>.apache.org/downloads if it exists, or no link at all. That way,
> projects that maintain a downloads page would have a proper link and those
> that do not would not.
Rather than eliminate every possible place that’s imperfect, please join in the
tooling team’s efforts with ATR as we design the catalog in a way that will
grapple with these imperfections.
Best,
Dave
>
> Craig
>
>>
>> Sebb
>> [1] https://projects.apache.org/releases.html
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> [email protected]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
