On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > > > 2008/7/24 Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> FYI, I'm planning to create a branch to apply and review Marica's work > >> on CONTINUUM-782 (local repository purging) and related issues -- > >> separate local repos per group, etc. > >> > >> It looks like CONTINUUM-1759 (ability to delete working copies > >> associated with releases) was combined with 782, though I don't > >> immediately see how it's related. > > > > I was waiting for Marica's iCLA to be recorded, which has now > > happened. However, I'm booked for the next week, so if anyone else > > wants to review and commit this, feel free. I won't get back to it > > until next Wednesday at the earliest. > > I can work on this in a dedicated branch. I have a first (small) look > at the patch and I have seen model change. If we can not have this (or > having a upgrade tool ;-) ). > For 1.2, I'd prefer to not change the db schema. Emmanuel > > > > > I like it. :) A branch may not be necessary unless someone else sees > > something that needs more work or discussion. > > > > One slight concern I have is that it introduces a dependency on an > > Archiva jar. It was a snapshot dependency, but Archiva just released > > 1.1 so that's no longer a problem. But is this something that Archiva > > intends for re-use, or just something internal to it? > > > > -- > > Wendy > > >
