I have committed the patch in the branch. I have changed the application.xml in the webapp to handle two new fields in an object. And I can start with a 1.1 db. I will try this with a copy of my production company continuum database which is more huge.
-- Olivier 2008/7/24 Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> 2008/7/24 Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> FYI, I'm planning to create a branch to apply and review Marica's work >> >> on CONTINUUM-782 (local repository purging) and related issues -- >> >> separate local repos per group, etc. >> >> >> >> It looks like CONTINUUM-1759 (ability to delete working copies >> >> associated with releases) was combined with 782, though I don't >> >> immediately see how it's related. >> > >> > I was waiting for Marica's iCLA to be recorded, which has now >> > happened. However, I'm booked for the next week, so if anyone else >> > wants to review and commit this, feel free. I won't get back to it >> > until next Wednesday at the earliest. >> >> I can work on this in a dedicated branch. I have a first (small) look >> at the patch and I have seen model change. If we can not have this (or >> having a upgrade tool ;-) ). >> > > For 1.2, I'd prefer to not change the db schema. > > Emmanuel > > >> >> > >> > I like it. :) A branch may not be necessary unless someone else sees >> > something that needs more work or discussion. >> > >> > One slight concern I have is that it introduces a dependency on an >> > Archiva jar. It was a snapshot dependency, but Archiva just released >> > 1.1 so that's no longer a problem. But is this something that Archiva >> > intends for re-use, or just something internal to it? >> > >> > -- >> > Wendy >> > >> >
