The size (8000) is already define for mssql: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/trunk/continuum-model/src/main/resources/package-mssql.orm
Emmanuel On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > arghhhh :-))) > > It's due to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1688. > > We can certainly reduce the size to 8000. > I will reopen the issue. > IMHO, we should control it and why not reduce the String if it's too long > > -- > Olivier > PS : olamy complains about database vendor restriction ;-) > > 2008/9/10 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Sorry for finding more issues :) Since this one is a regression I thought > it > > might require some attention. > > > > I saw on the users@ list that someone had a problem using SQL Server > because > > of the length of changeComment being increased to 8192 (> 8000). I think > > this was previously shorter - is that right? > > > > If so, should it be reduced by this small amount? > > > > I'm still getting to test the database upgrade... once done and > documented > > I'm happy with the release. > > > > - Brett > > > > -- > > Brett Porter > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > > >
