Great. But why it doesn't work and how to enable this ? Sorry I don't have a mssql server here ;-)
-- Olivier 2008/9/10 Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The size (8000) is already define for mssql: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/trunk/continuum-model/src/main/resources/package-mssql.orm > > Emmanuel > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> arghhhh :-))) >> >> It's due to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1688. >> >> We can certainly reduce the size to 8000. >> I will reopen the issue. >> IMHO, we should control it and why not reduce the String if it's too long >> >> -- >> Olivier >> PS : olamy complains about database vendor restriction ;-) >> >> 2008/9/10 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > Sorry for finding more issues :) Since this one is a regression I thought >> it >> > might require some attention. >> > >> > I saw on the users@ list that someone had a problem using SQL Server >> because >> > of the length of changeComment being increased to 8192 (> 8000). I think >> > this was previously shorter - is that right? >> > >> > If so, should it be reduced by this small amount? >> > >> > I'm still getting to test the database upgrade... once done and >> documented >> > I'm happy with the release. >> > >> > - Brett >> > >> > -- >> > Brett Porter >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >> > >> > >> >
