Hello Ken, Those 2 branches were created to investigate different approaches with JPA. I don't remember a consensus reached on which one to use.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Both was "test" branches. If you want to look at one, I'd prefer you look at > mine (continuum-jpa-evenisse) ;-) Yeah ditto, I'd prefer you look at continuum-jpa ;-)) > My branch was based on jpa annotations and the other one was done with sql > in the code. I think annotations are better but I'm not a JPA expert. Emmanuel, I am not sure I understand - where did you find sql in the code? I think we have discussed the approached a few times on this list but your comment above sounds like you didn't quite grasp the motivation behind it. Ken, feel free to poke around with both and let us know if you have any queries or issues. The continuum-jpa used OpenJPA as JPA provider for investigation, but IIRC there was an inclination to go with TopLink in the group. Cheers, Rahul
