On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hello Ken, > > Those 2 branches were created to investigate different approaches with > JPA. I don't remember a consensus reached on which one to use. > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Emmanuel Venisse > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Both was "test" branches. If you want to look at one, I'd prefer you look > at > > mine (continuum-jpa-evenisse) ;-) > > Yeah ditto, I'd prefer you look at continuum-jpa ;-)) > > > My branch was based on jpa annotations and the other one was done with > sql > > in the code. I think annotations are better but I'm not a JPA expert. > > Emmanuel, I am not sure I understand - where did you find sql in the > code? I think we have discussed the approached a few times on this > list but your comment above sounds like you didn't quite grasp the > motivation behind it. Not sql but JPQL. For example in toString method in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/branches/continuum-jpa/continuum-model-jpa/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/store/jpa/ProjectGroupQuery.java You're probably right, I don't grasp the motivation and I don't really like all string concatenations in toString() methods. > > > Ken, feel free to poke around with both and let us know if you have > any queries or issues. The continuum-jpa used OpenJPA as JPA provider > for investigation, but IIRC there was an inclination to go with > TopLink in the group. > > Cheers, > Rahul >
