+1 for me too. -- Olivier
2008/9/24 Marica Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 on the branch :) I think the transient state should go in 1.3, it's too > soon for 1.2.1 hehe :) > > Thanks, > -- > Marica > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On 23/09/2008, at 8:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> Author: olamy >>> Date: Tue Sep 23 03:17:20 2008 >>> New Revision: 698121 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=698121&view=rev >>> Log: >>> next release 1.2.1 (to discuss if we move this to a branch) >>> >> >> Considering Marica has a couple of pretty big changes ready to roll in, I >> think a branch is better (unless they are intended for 1.2.1). >> >> Either way, I hope 1.3 with those included is not far away! With SVN going >> down again yesterday, I'm keen for transient state notification changes :) >> >> Cheers, >> Brett >> >> -- >> Brett Porter >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >> >> >
