done.
2008/9/24 Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 for me too. > > -- > Olivier > > 2008/9/24 Marica Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> +1 on the branch :) I think the transient state should go in 1.3, it's too >> soon for 1.2.1 hehe :) >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Marica >> >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 23/09/2008, at 8:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>> Author: olamy >>>> Date: Tue Sep 23 03:17:20 2008 >>>> New Revision: 698121 >>>> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=698121&view=rev >>>> Log: >>>> next release 1.2.1 (to discuss if we move this to a branch) >>>> >>> >>> Considering Marica has a couple of pretty big changes ready to roll in, I >>> think a branch is better (unless they are intended for 1.2.1). >>> >>> Either way, I hope 1.3 with those included is not far away! With SVN going >>> down again yesterday, I'm keen for transient state notification changes :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Brett >>> >>> -- >>> Brett Porter >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >>> >>> >> >
