On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:24 AM, José Morales Martínez <[email protected]> wrote:
> I noticed that the test uses JUnit, version 3.8.1. As a suggestion, I propose > the possibility of using TestNG [1]. In TestNG we can config groups, > dependencies inter groups, order, timeOut, ... It also allows the use of > annotations. > It's a bit harder to configure, but it has its advantages. > [1] http://testng.org Is it time to make a decision on this? I've been applying patches on both sides, and I have a feeling the tests probably overlap in functionality by now. Brett mentioned that it's possible to run JUnit tests with TestNG, maybe that would be a first step towards consolidation? -- Wendy
