Yeah, just toss them in src/test/java together, Surefire will sort it
out if you aren't using a suite XML, and if you are they are easy
enough to add in there.
I definitely prefer TestNG in the long run for the configurability of
the tests using dependencies and groups, and so on.
- Brett
On 18/04/2009, at 7:13 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:24 AM, José Morales Martínez
<[email protected]> wrote:
I noticed that the test uses JUnit, version 3.8.1. As a suggestion,
I propose the possibility of using TestNG [1]. In TestNG we can
config groups, dependencies inter groups, order, timeOut, ... It
also allows the use of annotations.
It's a bit harder to configure, but it has its advantages.
[1] http://testng.org
Is it time to make a decision on this? I've been applying patches on
both sides, and I have a feeling the tests probably overlap in
functionality by now. Brett mentioned that it's possible to run JUnit
tests with TestNG, maybe that would be a first step towards
consolidation?
--
Wendy
