I would love to see work on this! As I just posted on the old "Separating the builder from the UI" thread, my preference is a code-named branch. (Yeah, the poms will probably say 2.0-SNAPSHOT. :) ) Let's see it working before we decide "this is the 2.0 trunk".
-- Wendy On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Emmanuel Venisse<emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks. > > What do you think if we create a branch for continuum 1.4.x to continue the > development and use the trunk to start the implementation of the new > architecture (Continuum 2)?
