If we create a branch, the merge to trunk will be a big work because we have lot of work to implement the new architecture.
Emmanuel On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would love to see work on this! As I just posted on the old > "Separating the builder from the UI" thread, my preference is a > code-named branch. (Yeah, the poms will probably say 2.0-SNAPSHOT. :) > ) Let's see it working before we decide "this is the 2.0 trunk". > > -- > Wendy > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Emmanuel > Venisse<emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks. > > > > What do you think if we create a branch for continuum 1.4.x to continue > the > > development and use the trunk to start the implementation of the new > > architecture (Continuum 2)? >
