WebOS still gets distributed unlike Symbian. -Steve
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Leutwyler, Markus <markus.leutwy...@hp.com>wrote: > Should we put Open webOS/webOS back to the Core Platforms since Cordova's > importance is publicly documented? > > See > http://blog.openwebosproject.org/post/39278618299/javascript-apps-for-open-webos-with-enyo-and-cordova > > Markus > > -----Original Message----- > From: Filip Maj [mailto:f...@adobe.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2013 22:44 > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Review of Core Platforms > > Our CorePlatforms wiki article [1] has this: > > ---- > > Core: These are the main platforms supported by the Apache Cordova project. > > * iOS > * Android > * BlackBerry > * Windows Phone > * Bada > > Sunset: These are platforms considered to be on their way out of general > consumer availability. We offer code, but not distribution of these > platforms. > > * Symbian > * webOS > > Sunrise: These are new platforms coming to Apache Cordova with some > development under way. > > * Tizen > * Qt > > Horizon: These are platforms that we hope to see supported by Apache > Cordova in the future! > > * B2G > > ---- > > > Some propositions + questions, all up for debate of course: > > - I'm not sure about Bada. Last I checked Bada's passing % of mobile-spec > is fairly weak (some features are just not doable; correct me if I'm > wrong). I would like to propose that a platform is eligible for "Core" if > they have >90% passing rate on mobile-spec. I would vote to move it into a > new "Marginal" category, along with, say, cordova-mac or cordova-qt. Also, > Bada-wac, how does this fit in? > - Where does the ubuntu phone fit into this? > - I would suggest we schedule removal of the BlackBerry 7 (java) and > Playbook (Air) implementations, and have our BlackBerry implementation be > BB10 only moving forward. > - The "Windows Phone" category above covers both 7 and 8? What about > Windows 8? > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/PlatformSupport > >
