Ok. So I removed 'sunrise', updated the definition text to include what was discussed here, and moved Bada to sunset.
I noticed Windows 8 made its way into our core platforms without any mention in this thread. I have no objection to this, though I'm not sure it implements the entirety of the definition we describe. On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for bada removal from core platforms. Samsung is not even working on it > anymore. "We're focused on Tizen" is what their marketing people told me > last time I asked them about it. > I think we should ship only platforms that matter (i.e platforms that > appear on Analyst's market share numbers) and document how to build the > others from source (because people do use them even if they're not > necessarily loud about it). > > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >Think its still good to make this distinction even though our scope is >> >going to drastically reduce (in a sense). The benefit of these labels >> >is to indicate how much involvement developers using Cordova can >> >expect the Cordova platform to maintain. >> > >> >Core platforms target an operating system, with devices in >> >circulation, providing: >> > >> >- A standard low level bridge API and utilities. >> >- Standard set of low level CLI tools >> >- Embeddable (if possible) >> >- InAppBrowser and other browser-ish shims like alerts, etc. >> >- [what else?] >> >> A native plugin API? >> >>
