Works for me, however, to accommodate EU community we must to consider times unholy. This is Apache Way from what I understand.
I created a form to help us pick a time to talk. http://goo.gl/h9d1a On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > Okay gentlemen, I think there have been countless good points made from all > parties, but also some bike-shedding. > > Perhaps it is time to schedule some face-time to better articulate some of > the finer points, and to help come to some consensus? > > -Michal > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sorry if this got asked before, but does a feature branch get deleted >> after it is merged? Just wondering about branch clutter over a long period, >> or if this is just the same as a topic branch using today's committer >> workflow. >> >> >> On 1/14/2013 5:34 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >> >>> You work on a Feature branch. It gets rolled into Dev as needed so >>> others can merge / collaborate on said feature. When it feels right >>> instead of merging a large set of potentially breaking commits to >>> Unstable the dev working on said feature just merges that feature. >>> This would require more responsibility for the committer to keep track >>> of their feature branches which I could see as being more overhead. >>> >>> >>
