I was the one who didn't want to sign up for G+ :) Now it's a moot point as my gramma uses it and so, by proxy, I am required to as well :P
On 1/15/13 6:22 AM, "Michal Mocny" <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: >Thanks for coordinating schedules Brain. Im quite glad to be on EST :) > >We should also establish a medium: Google hangouts were not well received >by everyone last year, (not everyone had a G+ account), but I cannot think >of anything that is nearly as convenient. Suggestions? > >-Michal > > >On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Becky Gibson ><gibson.be...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Am I correct in assuming US pacific time zone? >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Jan 15, 2013, at 4:36 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> >> > Works for me, however, to accommodate EU community we must to consider >> > times unholy. This is Apache Way from what I understand. >> > >> > I created a form to help us pick a time to talk. >> > >> > http://goo.gl/h9d1a >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> >> Okay gentlemen, I think there have been countless good points made >>from >> all >> >> parties, but also some bike-shedding. >> >> >> >> Perhaps it is time to schedule some face-time to better articulate >>some >> of >> >> the finer points, and to help come to some consensus? >> >> >> >> -Michal >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Sorry if this got asked before, but does a feature branch get >>deleted >> >>> after it is merged? Just wondering about branch clutter over a long >> period, >> >>> or if this is just the same as a topic branch using today's >>committer >> >>> workflow. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 1/14/2013 5:34 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> You work on a Feature branch. It gets rolled into Dev as needed so >> >>>> others can merge / collaborate on said feature. When it feels right >> >>>> instead of merging a large set of potentially breaking commits to >> >>>> Unstable the dev working on said feature just merges that feature. >> >>>> This would require more responsibility for the committer to keep >>track >> >>>> of their feature branches which I could see as being more overhead. >> >>> >>
