-1 We should just make the windows scripts work better. Needs more descriptive failures when something is not setup correctly.
Simon Mac Donald http://hi.im/simonmacdonald On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 > > I (and most people) just want to get going and don't like dependencies. > We're already requiring nodejs for a lot of the stuff we do. > > If you're referring to the Android windows scripts. I believe they work > fine. If there are any issues with them, people should report them just as > they would report any other issue. > > There is one outstanding issue on Windows that I will fix next week. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1961 > > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Kerri Shotts <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Just my 2ยข: people are already complaining about the number of parts that > > need to be installed -- do we really want to add yet another? I realize > it > > would make the scripts easier, but the more moving (third party) parts > that > > have to be installed prior to using PhoneGap (especially those that > aren't > > required for the platform's SDK), the higher the barrier to entry. (But > > then again, maybe that's a good thing...?) > > > > ___________________________________ > > Kerri Shotts > > photoKandy Studios, LLC > > > > On the Web: http://www.photokandy.com/ > > > > Social Media: > > Twitter: @photokandy, http://twitter.com/photokandy > > Tumblr: http://photokandy.tumblr.com/ > > Github: https://github.com/kerrishotts > > > https://github.com/organizations/photokandyStudios > > CoderWall: https://coderwall.com/kerrishotts > > > > Apps on the Apple Store: > > > > https://itunes.apple.com/us/artist/photokandy-studios-llc/id498577828 > > > > > > > > On Jan 20, 2013, at 8:14, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I'm sure this has come up some time in the past, but why not require > > cygwin > > > so that our scripts will work on windows? Cygwin has been a requirement > > of > > > most of the windows projects I've worked on in the past (when at > > different > > > companies). > > >
