++
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On 1/21/13 11:16 AM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>I would vote for standardizing on node for all our scripts >> >> >>On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yes, node is already a dependency for the CLI, so why not roll with that >>> for cross-platform goodness. >>> >>> On 1/21/13 7:24 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >Yep, I was mostly thinking about Android with this question. There's >>> >really >>> >two aspects that it would simplify: >>> > >>> >1. Our documentation would not have to worry about windows vs. unix >>> >2. Our scripts (and upgrade scripts) won't have to be written twice. >>> >Although maybe if we are making node a requirement (due to CLI yes?) >>>then >>> >writing them in node would save us writing them twice. Still, they >>>would >>> >need to be tested & tweaks for windows I would assume. >>> > >>> >I'm totally fine keeping things as-is. Just thought the question had >>>to be >>> >raised :) >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Kerri Shotts >>> ><[email protected]>wrote: >>> > >>> >> Yes, please! Descriptive errors would go a long way to making the >>> >> tools easier to use. At least it would point at a specific reason for >>> >> failure vs the current vague message. >>> >> >>> >> ______________________________ >>> >> Kerri Shotts >>> >> photoKandy Studios LLC >>> >> >>> >> Sent from my iPhone >>> >> >>> >> ๐ฑ Phone: +1 (312) 380-1035 >>> >> ๐ Web: http://photokandy.com >>> >> >>> >> Twitter: @photokandy >>> >> >>> >> On Jan 20, 2013, at 22:14, Simon MacDonald >>><[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > -1 >>> >> > >>> >> > We should just make the windows scripts work better. Needs more >>> >> descriptive >>> >> > failures when something is not setup correctly. >>> >> > >>> >> > Simon Mac Donald >>> >> > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> -1 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I (and most people) just want to get going and don't like >>> >>dependencies. >>> >> >> We're already requiring nodejs for a lot of the stuff we do. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> If you're referring to the Android windows scripts. I believe they >>> >>work >>> >> >> fine. If there are any issues with them, people should report them >>> >>just >>> >> as >>> >> >> they would report any other issue. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> There is one outstanding issue on Windows that I will fix next >>>week. >>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1961 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Kerri Shotts < >>> [email protected] >>> >> >>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Just my 2ยข: people are already complaining about the number of >>>parts >>> >> that >>> >> >>> need to be installed -- do we really want to add yet another? I >>> >>realize >>> >> >> it >>> >> >>> would make the scripts easier, but the more moving (third party) >>> >>parts >>> >> >> that >>> >> >>> have to be installed prior to using PhoneGap (especially those >>>that >>> >> >> aren't >>> >> >>> required for the platform's SDK), the higher the barrier to >>>entry. >>> >>(But >>> >> >>> then again, maybe that's a good thing...?) >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> ___________________________________ >>> >> >>> Kerri Shotts >>> >> >>> photoKandy Studios, LLC >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On the Web: http://www.photokandy.com/ >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Social Media: >>> >> >>> Twitter: @photokandy, http://twitter.com/photokandy >>> >> >>> Tumblr: http://photokandy.tumblr.com/ >>> >> >>> Github: https://github.com/kerrishotts >>> >> >> https://github.com/organizations/photokandyStudios >>> >> >>> CoderWall: https://coderwall.com/kerrishotts >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Apps on the Apple Store: >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>https://itunes.apple.com/us/artist/photokandy-studios-llc/id498577828 >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On Jan 20, 2013, at 8:14, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> >>>wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> I'm sure this has come up some time in the past, but why not >>> >>require >>> >> >>> cygwin >>> >> >>>> so that our scripts will work on windows? Cygwin has been a >>> >> requirement >>> >> >>> of >>> >> >>>> most of the windows projects I've worked on in the past (when at >>> >> >>> different >>> >> >>>> companies). >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >
