I'm thinking we encourage:
var insta = require('instagram')
insta.share( ... )
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> wrote:
> No reason to exist there, other than that is the way it used to be.
> I would rather just see :
>
> var myRef = Instagram.install();
> myRef.share( ... )
>
> I'll fork it.
>
> Also, I think we need to educate people on the use of objects&&prototypes,
> by example.
> We too have multiple places where we define a prototype object of which
> there will only evar be one ... off-topic sorry ...
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Don't think so. Should be up to the user. That said Cordova should provide
>> a registration mechanism to enable collision detection (I think Andrew
>> Grieve has something like this in his symbol mapping branch in cordova-js).
>>
>> On 1/28/13 10:34 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >The community is starting to put plugins in their own repos (good). I
>> >noticed this one today:
>> >
>> >https://github.com/vstirbu/InstagramPlugin
>> >
>> >(Awesome.)
>> >
>> >But I can't stand window.plugins any longer. I think this might be a
>> >hangover from the existing plugin space but not totally sure---is
>> >there a good reason to have the plugins global "namespace" anymore?
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
