+1
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > ah sorry that is what I meant actually----tho it does beg how > cordova.require and various other requires might work > > (I think Pat brought this up last year.) > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hmm, how does this fit in with cordova.require ? > > > > On 1/28/13 11:11 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>I'm thinking we encourage: > >> > >>var insta = require('instagram') > >>insta.share( ... ) > >> > >> > >> > >>On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> No reason to exist there, other than that is the way it used to be. > >>> I would rather just see : > >>> > >>> var myRef = Instagram.install(); > >>> myRef.share( ... ) > >>> > >>> I'll fork it. > >>> > >>> Also, I think we need to educate people on the use of > >>>objects&&prototypes, > >>> by example. > >>> We too have multiple places where we define a prototype object of which > >>> there will only evar be one ... off-topic sorry ... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Don't think so. Should be up to the user. That said Cordova should > >>>>provide > >>>> a registration mechanism to enable collision detection (I think Andrew > >>>> Grieve has something like this in his symbol mapping branch in > >>>>cordova-js). > >>>> > >>>> On 1/28/13 10:34 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> >The community is starting to put plugins in their own repos (good). I > >>>> >noticed this one today: > >>>> > > >>>> >https://github.com/vstirbu/InstagramPlugin > >>>> > > >>>> >(Awesome.) > >>>> > > >>>> >But I can't stand window.plugins any longer. I think this might be a > >>>> >hangover from the existing plugin space but not totally sure---is > >>>> >there a good reason to have the plugins global "namespace" anymore? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> @purplecabbage > >>> risingj.com > > >
