It's not a bug-fix, so push to master :)
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > K I've got a little bit ready. Just benches: > > 1. The # of exec invocations possible in a time interval > 2. The # of exec callback invocations possible in a time interval > > Now my conundrum is: where do I push this to? Next branch? Master? :( > > On 2/19/13 12:16 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Awesome stuff Fil! The first one is one that I tried before when doing the > >bridge benchmark and found it to not get accurate results. Had a look at > >the README.md of the second one, and it sounds pretty good. Looking > >forward > >to seeing what you come up with :) > > > > > >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Raising this thread from the dead :) > >> > >> I'm thinking of either http://benchmarkjs.com/ or > >> https://github.com/akdubya/uubench > >> > >> Both apparently support async which is our only requirement AFAIK. > >> > >> Will mess aboot with adding both to mobile-spec and seeing how it pans > >>out. > >> > >> On 10/26/12 11:09 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >eh folks, any thoughts on using > >> >https://github.com/robohornet/robohornet for benching? > >> > >> > >
