... Wrapped in your own plugin.. When stuff like this lands for ALL platforms then we can talk
On 2/22/13 2:11 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <[email protected]> wrote: >Sure it does. I wrote code to do this on Sunday. > >http://simonmacdonald.blogspot.ca/2013/02/phonegap-android-xhrfilereader.h >tml > >Just double checked that if I send it the path >file:///mnt/sdcard/robots.txt I am able to get the contents of the text >file. Lemme know what the problem is. > >Although, I'm headed home right now. > >Simon Mac Donald >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > >On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Xhr won't resolve to temp/persistent areas, at least on android :s >> >> On 2/22/13 1:54 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >What's XHR like reading something from the TEMP/PERSISTENT areas? >> > >> >Simon Mac Donald >> >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> > >> > >> >On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Check out the latest commit to mobile-spec to see the auto benches. I >> >>will >> >> work towards integrating with ci.cordova.io.. Eventually. There are >>so >> >> many things to do in that project, I could use volunteers :D >> >> >> >> Anyways, for a prelim auto bench result, here is what I get on my >>Galaxy >> >> Nexus running Android 4.2.2: >> >> >> >> Cordova.exec invocations (of Echo/echo plugin): ~3800 per second >> >> Cordova.exec callbacks coming back (from Echo/echo plugin): ~3600 per >> >> second >> >> XHR to the LICENSE file and get contents back (11kb) WITHIN the >> >> application www/ folder: ~2 per second >> >> Use FileReader to retrieve contents of LICENSE file (11kb) that is >> >>stored >> >> on the TEMP FileSystem: ~135 per second >> >> Use FileReader to retrieve contents of LICENSE file (11kb) that is >> >>stored >> >> on the PERSISTENT FileSystem: ~140 per second >> >> >> >> >> >> The FileReader tests create the LICENSE file before the start of the >> >> benchmarking, btw. >> >> >> >> Thoughts/comments/questions/feedback welcome. >> >> >> >> On 2/20/13 8:29 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >It's not a bug-fix, so push to master :) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> K I've got a little bit ready. Just benches: >> >> >> >> >> >> 1. The # of exec invocations possible in a time interval >> >> >> 2. The # of exec callback invocations possible in a time interval >> >> >> >> >> >> Now my conundrum is: where do I push this to? Next branch? >>Master? :( >> >> >> >> >> >> On 2/19/13 12:16 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >Awesome stuff Fil! The first one is one that I tried before when >> >>doing >> >> >>the >> >> >> >bridge benchmark and found it to not get accurate results. Had a >> >>look >> >> >>at >> >> >> >the README.md of the second one, and it sounds pretty good. >>Looking >> >> >> >forward >> >> >> >to seeing what you come up with :) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Raising this thread from the dead :) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm thinking of either http://benchmarkjs.com/ or >> >> >> >> https://github.com/akdubya/uubench >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Both apparently support async which is our only requirement >>AFAIK. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Will mess aboot with adding both to mobile-spec and seeing how >>it >> >> >>pans >> >> >> >>out. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 10/26/12 11:09 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >eh folks, any thoughts on using >> >> >> >> >https://github.com/robohornet/robohornet for benching? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
