Okay, checked them into next branch, and merged them into master as well.
Likely filetransfer is broken on all platforms without these files.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote:
> I think I've figured it out:
>
> agrieve@agrieve-macbookpro ~/git/cordova-js (next) $ git status
> # On branch next
> # Untracked files:
> # (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
> #
> # lib/common/plugin/filetransfer/
> # lib/windowsphone/plugin/filetransfer/
> nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to
> track)
>
> Whoops!
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.be...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> For added data, I also fail using the tagged cordova-js
>> (04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) built locally.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I just generated the js from cordova-js on tag 2.5.0rc1 (hash
>> > 04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) and I get the same results as
>> > I've always had :/
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Using the JS built from cordova-js it's working fine...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Could be the symbol mapping.
>> > > > Using Safari 6 iPhone Simulator debugging -- window.FileTransfer is
>> not
>> > > > defined, but I can do a
>> cordova.require("cordova/plugin/FileTransfer").
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Don't know what's wrong - with mob-spec 3e3d075 on iOS 2.5.0rc1 it
>> > > still
>> > > > > all fails. Trying iOS 2.4.0 (with latest mob-spec), it all
>> passes. I
>> > > > > suspect its in the cordova-js, not mob-spec
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Andrew, I re-verified and re-downloaded 2.5.0rc1 of iOS and
>> 2.5.0rc1
>> > > of
>> > > > >> mobile-spec, created a new project - I get the same results as I
>> had
>> > > > (both
>> > > > >> in Simulator and device as well).
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <
>> > agri...@chromium.org
>> > > > >wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> Just tried the tests and they are all passing for me (on
>> simulator)
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Becky Gibson <
>> > > gibson.be...@gmail.com
>> > > > >>> >wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> > This morning I did git pull apache next for mobile-spec and
>> got
>> > > > this:
>> > > > >>> > Updating 3e3d075..842e603
>> > > > >>> > Fast-forward
>> > > > >>> > VERSION | 2 +-
>> > > > >>> > autotest/tests/file.tests.js | 14 ++++++++++----
>> > > > >>> > autotest/tests/filetransfer.tests.js | 27
>> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++------
>> > > > >>> > cordova.js | 2 +-
>> > > > >>> > index.html | 1 +
>> > > > >>> > misc/index.html | 3 ++-
>> > > > >>> > misc/page2.html | 27
>> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> > > > >>> > splashscreen/index.html | 47
>> > > > >>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > > > >>> > 8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>> > > > >>> > create mode 100644 splashscreen/index.html
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > Does that help?
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > > That was my suspicion but i have no data on this yet. Which
>> > > > >>> > > mob-spec version? I can verify.
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson wrote:
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> > > > Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday (using an older
>> > > > version)
>> > > > >>> and
>> > > > >>> > I
>> > > > >>> > > > only had one failure so maybe the issue is with the tests
>> > > > >>> themselves.
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron <
>> shaz...@gmail.com
>> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > >>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then copy :)
>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal Mocny wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > Shaz how did you generate that text file output? Did
>> you
>> > > > open
>> > > > >>> > remote
>> > > > >>> > > > > > inspector and copy console output manually?
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron <
>> > > shaz...@gmail.com
>> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> > > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running 6.0.1 (to
>> rule
>> > > out
>> > > > >>> any
>> > > > >>> > > errors
>> > > > >>> > > > > due
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number of errors as
>> the
>> > > > >>> previous
>> > > > >>> > > two
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > devices.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Shazron <
>> > > > shaz...@gmail.com
>> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22 mobile-spec
>> > > > >>> failures (21
>> > > > >>> > > > > related
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > to
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them tomorrow and fix
>> > for a
>> > > > >>> re-tag.
>> > > > >>> > > The
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a text file.
>> > > Tested
>> > > > >>> on an
>> > > > >>> > > > > iPhone 5
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS 5.1.1, exact
>> > same
>> > > > >>> > failures.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm Wong <
>> > > > >>> > > > > kingoftheo...@hotmail.com <javascript:;><javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > From: shaz...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08 -0800
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1?
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> <javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for Eye-Oh-Ess,
>> > wrapping
>> > > > >>> things
>> > > > >>> > up.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Joe Bowser <
>> > > > >>> > > bows...@gmail.com<javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > Gone through the same process with Fil. If
>> we
>> > > fail,
>> > > > >>> we
>> > > > >>> > fail
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> together!!!!
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Filip Maj <
>> > > > >>> > f...@adobe.com
>> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues for 2.5.0rc1
>> > > tagging.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next" branch under the
>> > > > >>> javascript
>> > > > >>> > and
>> > > > >>> > > > > tagged
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> 2.5.0rc1
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I did it right :s
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <
>> > b...@brian.io
>> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> > > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim to get this
>> thing
>> > > > >>> > > tagged/bagged
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > today.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Filip
>> Maj <
>> > > > >>> > > f...@adobe.com<javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do it.
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe Bowser" <
>> > > > >>> bows...@gmail.com
>> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work? Do we create the
>> > next
>> > > > >>> branch
>> > > > >>> > > now
>> > > > >>> > > > > and
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> throw
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >things in that?
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > > > >>> > > >
>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
