Huzzah!
I take it you pushed mobile spec test changes without the cordova-js code
needed for them to pass? This is the downside of multi-repo :(
-Michal
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Okay, checked them into next branch, and merged them into master as well.
>
> Likely filetransfer is broken on all platforms without these files.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I think I've figured it out:
> >
> > agrieve@agrieve-macbookpro ~/git/cordova-js (next) $ git status
> > # On branch next
> > # Untracked files:
> > # (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
> > #
> > # lib/common/plugin/filetransfer/
> > # lib/windowsphone/plugin/filetransfer/
> > nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to
> > track)
> >
> > Whoops!
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.be...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> For added data, I also fail using the tagged cordova-js
> >> (04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) built locally.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I just generated the js from cordova-js on tag 2.5.0rc1 (hash
> >> > 04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) and I get the same results
> as
> >> > I've always had :/
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Using the JS built from cordova-js it's working fine...
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Could be the symbol mapping.
> >> > > > Using Safari 6 iPhone Simulator debugging -- window.FileTransfer
> is
> >> not
> >> > > > defined, but I can do a
> >> cordova.require("cordova/plugin/FileTransfer").
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Don't know what's wrong - with mob-spec 3e3d075 on iOS 2.5.0rc1
> it
> >> > > still
> >> > > > > all fails. Trying iOS 2.4.0 (with latest mob-spec), it all
> >> passes. I
> >> > > > > suspect its in the cordova-js, not mob-spec
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> Andrew, I re-verified and re-downloaded 2.5.0rc1 of iOS and
> >> 2.5.0rc1
> >> > > of
> >> > > > >> mobile-spec, created a new project - I get the same results as
> I
> >> had
> >> > > > (both
> >> > > > >> in Simulator and device as well).
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <
> >> > agri...@chromium.org
> >> > > > >wrote:
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> Just tried the tests and they are all passing for me (on
> >> simulator)
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Becky Gibson <
> >> > > gibson.be...@gmail.com
> >> > > > >>> >wrote:
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> > This morning I did git pull apache next for mobile-spec
> and
> >> got
> >> > > > this:
> >> > > > >>> > Updating 3e3d075..842e603
> >> > > > >>> > Fast-forward
> >> > > > >>> > VERSION | 2 +-
> >> > > > >>> > autotest/tests/file.tests.js | 14 ++++++++++----
> >> > > > >>> > autotest/tests/filetransfer.tests.js | 27
> >> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++------
> >> > > > >>> > cordova.js | 2 +-
> >> > > > >>> > index.html | 1 +
> >> > > > >>> > misc/index.html | 3 ++-
> >> > > > >>> > misc/page2.html | 27
> >> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >> > > > >>> > splashscreen/index.html | 47
> >> > > > >>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> > > > >>> > 8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >> > > > >>> > create mode 100644 splashscreen/index.html
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > Does that help?
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Shazron <
> shaz...@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > > That was my suspicion but i have no data on this yet.
> Which
> >> > > > >>> > > mob-spec version? I can verify.
> >> > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > >>> > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson wrote:
> >> > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday (using an
> older
> >> > > > version)
> >> > > > >>> and
> >> > > > >>> > I
> >> > > > >>> > > > only had one failure so maybe the issue is with the
> tests
> >> > > > >>> themselves.
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron <
> >> shaz...@gmail.com
> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>>
> >> > > > >>> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then copy :)
> >> > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal Mocny wrote:
> >> > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > Shaz how did you generate that text file output?
> Did
> >> you
> >> > > > open
> >> > > > >>> > remote
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > inspector and copy console output manually?
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron <
> >> > > shaz...@gmail.com
> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> > > > <javascript:;>>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running 6.0.1 (to
> >> rule
> >> > > out
> >> > > > >>> any
> >> > > > >>> > > errors
> >> > > > >>> > > > > due
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number of errors
> as
> >> the
> >> > > > >>> previous
> >> > > > >>> > > two
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > devices.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Shazron <
> >> > > > shaz...@gmail.com
> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22
> mobile-spec
> >> > > > >>> failures (21
> >> > > > >>> > > > > related
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > to
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them tomorrow and
> fix
> >> > for a
> >> > > > >>> re-tag.
> >> > > > >>> > > The
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a text
> file.
> >> > > Tested
> >> > > > >>> on an
> >> > > > >>> > > > > iPhone 5
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS 5.1.1,
> exact
> >> > same
> >> > > > >>> > failures.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm Wong <
> >> > > > >>> > > > > kingoftheo...@hotmail.com<javascript:;><javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >wrote:
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > From: shaz...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >> > > <javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08 -0800
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1?
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> <javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for Eye-Oh-Ess,
> >> > wrapping
> >> > > > >>> things
> >> > > > >>> > up.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Joe Bowser
> <
> >> > > > >>> > > bows...@gmail.com<javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > Gone through the same process with Fil. If
> >> we
> >> > > fail,
> >> > > > >>> we
> >> > > > >>> > fail
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> together!!!!
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Filip
> Maj <
> >> > > > >>> > f...@adobe.com
> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues for 2.5.0rc1
> >> > > tagging.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next" branch under
> the
> >> > > > >>> javascript
> >> > > > >>> > and
> >> > > > >>> > > > > tagged
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> 2.5.0rc1
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I did it right :s
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <
> >> > b...@brian.io
> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> > > > <javascript:;>>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim to get this
> >> thing
> >> > > > >>> > > tagged/bagged
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > today.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Filip
> >> Maj <
> >> > > > >>> > > f...@adobe.com<javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do it.
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe Bowser" <
> >> > > > >>> bows...@gmail.com
> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work? Do we create
> the
> >> > next
> >> > > > >>> branch
> >> > > > >>> > > now
> >> > > > >>> > > > > and
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> throw
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >things in that?
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
