+1
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ok, I think we have agreement that we'll put these guys on hold until > > they find a steward. This means: > > > > - we won't be taggin them further > > - we won't be including them in a release > > > > This does not mean: > > > > - deletion or archiving or attic for the src > > > > (Think of it as a pause button!) > > > > Agree/disagree? > > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > If there are no fixes going into these platforms, then there is no > > benefit > > > in their users updating them to newer versions of Cordova. > > > > > > There's going to be more refactoring required when moving plugins to > > their > > > own repos. We'll really need owners for all platforms that will make > the > > > transition, or else we won't have any way to test that the refactoring > > > hasn't broken a platform. On specific example is that blackberry's JS > > repo > > > is really 4-in-1 currently, and our plugin spec doesn't have support > for > > > this. They will need to be split out into 4 separate platforms, at > least > > as > > > far as the JS is concerned. > > > > > > So... I guess my +1 is just for any platform that doesn't have a > someone > > > willing to focus on it. E.g. I'm fine with keeping WebOS around if > Markus > > > wants to do the work to support it through this transition. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Ken Wallis <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> We will try to provide relevant stats on platform adoption as we are > > able. > > >> I am anxiously awaiting that information myself. ;) > > >> > > >> While lacking this information, I still feel that BBOS will be with us > > for > > >> a deal of time, particularly in the enterprise where we are seeing a > > >> significant trend towards Cordova/PhoneGap/WebWorks as the primary > > platform > > >> of choice for apps. This is, frustratingly, a difficult market to get > > >> adequate metrics out of, as they will typically not use PhoneGap Build > > IMO, > > >> and they don't deploy to commercial application stores. A bit of a > black > > >> box, but our enterprise support teams continually support the notion > > that > > >> enterprise looks at HTML5 apps first. > > >> > > >> In this regard, we would like to see support for BBOS be maintained in > > the > > >> short term. Our team is focused on bringing up BlackBerry 10 built on > > >> Cordova, and once that has gotten to a stable point we will then be > > able to > > >> look at resources and determine if BBOS is still a valuable platform > to > > >> support and if we can port BBOS to the new structures. > > >> > > >> Hope that makes sense. > > >> > > >> Sent from my BlackBerry Z10 smartphone. > > >> From: Anis KADRI > > >> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:00 PM > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Reply To: [email protected] > > >> Subject: Re: archiving older platforms > > >> > > >> > > >> s/QR/Qt > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Lorin Beer <[email protected] > > >> >wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 Bada/webOS/QR > > >> > > > >> > echoing Michael's point, I'd like to see usage stats on the older BB > > >> > platforms. BB10 should absolutely be the focus, but If they are > > currently > > >> > being used, mothballing may be premature. Revisiting the issues > > >> regularly, > > >> > and making one based on usage stats makes the most sense to me. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > +1 all of them, Java and Air implementations of BlackBerry as > well. > > >> > > > > >> > > For the older implementations of BlackBerry, nothing is stopping > > anyone > > >> > > from using that code. The fact is that Java and Air-related fixes > > have > > >> > not > > >> > > been going in regularly. The implementations are stable enough > that > > >> > > drawing a line in the sand and saying no more active support for > the > > >> > older > > >> > > BB SDKs is acceptable in my opinion. > > >> > > > > >> > > On 3/17/13 11:44 AM, "Michael Brooks" <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> As far as bb 6 and 7, I am sure the majority of devices out > there > > >> are > > >> > > >>BB 6 > > >> > > >> and 7. BB10 just came out so there can't be that many yet. > > >> Developers > > >> > > >>don't > > >> > > >> seem to be interested in those platform though and I think the > > focus > > >> > > >>should > > >> > > >> be on BB10. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >It would probably be more accurate to say "BlackBerry Java" which > > >> > includes > > >> > > >BB 4.6/5/6/7 - yep, we "support" all the way back 4.6 although no > > one > > >> > > >tests > > >> > > >that far back anymore. > > >> > > > > > >> > > >I've heard BlackBerry voice the opinion that they would like to > see > > >> > Apache > > >> > > >Cordova focus solely on BlackBerry 10. However, PhoneGap/Build > has > > >> seen > > >> > a > > >> > > >large demand for BlackBerry 5 and 6. > > >> > > > > > >> > > >+1 Bada > > >> > > > > > >> > > >+1 webOS - we may want to bring this out of the Attic in the > future > > >> > > > > > >> > > >+1 QR - we may want to bring it this out of the Attic when > gearing > > up > > >> > for > > >> > > >Ubuntu Phone > > >> > > > > > >> > > >+0 BB - I want to talk with the our PhoneGap/Build team to better > > >> > > >understand their stance. I'd also like Ken or Jeff from > BlackBerry > > to > > >> > > >chime > > >> > > >in with their opinion. > > >> > > > > > >> > > >On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Anis KADRI < > [email protected] > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> +1 to kill those platforms and archive them in the attic :-D > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> If WebOS, Qt become relevant again we can revive them from the > > >> attic. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Anis KADRI < > > [email protected]> > > >> > > >>wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > According to [1]: > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > "Projects whose PMC are unable to muster 3 votes for a > release, > > >> who > > >> > > >>have > > >> > > >> > no active committers or are unable to fulfill their reporting > > >> duties > > >> > > >>to > > >> > > >> the > > >> > > >> > board are all good candidates for the Attic." > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > I believe those projects satisfy the "no active committers" > > >> > argument. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > I don't see any active committers for Bada, Qt or WebOS. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Markus Leutwyler is the only WebOS committer and is no longer > > >> > > >>employed by > > >> > > >> > the company that is in charge of it and I am not sure if he's > > >> still > > >> > > >> > interested in maintaining it. There are still devices out > > there I > > >> am > > >> > > >>sure > > >> > > >> > but no new devices are getting shipped. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Bada is officially dead [2] but they still released an SDK a > > >> couple > > >> > of > > >> > > >> > weeks ago [3] O_O! They still owned #4 spot in Q3 2012 ahead > of > > >> > > >>Windows > > >> > > >> > Phone [4] > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > As far as bb 6 and 7, I am sure the majority of devices out > > there > > >> > are > > >> > > >>BB > > >> > > >> 6 > > >> > > >> > and 7. BB10 just came out so there can't be that many yet. > > >> > Developers > > >> > > >> don't > > >> > > >> > seem to be interested in those platform though and I think > the > > >> focus > > >> > > >> should > > >> > > >> > be on BB10. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > [1] http://attic.apache.org/ > > >> > > >> > [2] > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > http://www.fiercemobilecontent.com/story/samsung-scraps-bada-os-folds-it- > > >> > > >>tizen/2013-02-25 > > >> > > >> > [3] http://static.bada.com/releasenotes/2.0.6.html > > >> > > >> > [4] http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2237315 > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> >> The question has come up about our continued support for: > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> - bada > > >> > > >> >> - webos > > >> > > >> >> - qt > > >> > > >> >> - bb6 & bb7 > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Nobody is currently actively maintaining Bada, and Qt. > > However, I > > >> > > >> >> could see us wanting to keep Qt around given Ubuntu Phone. > > There > > >> > are > > >> > > >> >> no new webOS devices, though rumours persist they could > > happen, > > >> it > > >> > > >> >> seems like its more of a ceremony than real support. The > > older BB > > >> > > >> >> platforms are maintained but the real focus is BB10. > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Thoughts? > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential > > >> information, privileged material (including material protected by the > > >> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute > > non-public > > >> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the > > intended > > >> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in > > error, > > >> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information > from > > >> your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this > > >> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be > > unlawful. > > >> > > >
