I'm fine with removing server. In my mind ripple is just a serve command on steroids. At this morning's meeting I believe some of the Googlers expressed concerns about axing out serve, so perhaps a prudent first step would be to add Ripple as an `emulate` command and then we can take baby steps to extract out serve over the coming weeks.
On 3/22/13 2:45 PM, "Gord Tanner" <gtan...@gmail.com> wrote: >Ripple is now ready to be integrated, currently I have it added as a >seperate ripple command in a personal branch [1] > >Most of the work on Ripple was a much needed feature we knew we needed >(Device Selection via query string [2]) as well as adding the ability to >serve content from multiple directories [3] (to support www/ merged with >platform/www/). > >Should I do the full remove serve and add this to emulate or merge this in >as is? (maybe remove serve in the meantime) > >[1] - https://github.com/gtanner/cordova-cli/tree/ripple >[2] - >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ripple.git;a=commitdif >f;h=b36213d426700a3cc62b4701bc75806ff8539528 >[3] - >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ripple.git;a=commitdif >f;h=2e483836bc5a24397ed002556f4209fac9508438 > > >On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Thats awesome ;) >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Gord Tanner <gtan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Yeah Michal, >> > >> > That is the exact use case I had in mind. When we were a startup we >> > couldn't afford mac's so just used linux and ripple for all our >>contract >> > work and borrowed a friends macbook when we needed to compile. >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Very interesting. Combined with Bradens proposal to support >>pointing >> to >> > a >> > > local platform, looks very good. >> > > >> > > Also note, offline isn't the only reason, platform support on a >>given >> > > machine as well: ie, can "test" iPhone (sorta) on a linux box >>through >> > > Ripple. >> > > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > > >> > > > omg I just realized this would fulfill offline use case vs lazy >>load >> > > > vendoring >> > > > >> > > > caching could be a future thing >> > > > >> > > > might be a really nice path >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Gord Tanner <gtan...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > > > +1 >> > > > > >> > > > > With this I would want to add the ability to add a platform to a >> > > project >> > > > even if we don't have the build dependencies. >> > > > > >> > > > > Emulate would just default to ripple so is still usable if we >>can't >> > > > build/deploy >> > > > > >> > > > > Sent from my iPhone >> > > > > >> > > > > On 2013-03-22, at 1:55 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > >> I think this bleeds back into other discussions. It was >>mentioned >> in >> > > > >> the call earlier. I think some tacit agreement that ./serve >>goes >> > away >> > > > >> and Ripple is the default ./emulate command. But lets discuss. >> (Just >> > > > >> this. Lets keep thread focused.) >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
