K lets try to land it in 2.6.0rc1. There is still time Gord! Blackberry + iOS not tagged yet so we can land some more commits in cordova-cli
On 3/22/13 3:02 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote: >Like that plan. Say we proceed and land it in 2.6 to feel out. > >On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> I'm fine with removing server. In my mind ripple is just a serve command >> on steroids. At this morning's meeting I believe some of the Googlers >> expressed concerns about axing out serve, so perhaps a prudent first >>step >> would be to add Ripple as an `emulate` command and then we can take baby >> steps to extract out serve over the coming weeks. >> >> On 3/22/13 2:45 PM, "Gord Tanner" <gtan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>Ripple is now ready to be integrated, currently I have it added as a >>>seperate ripple command in a personal branch [1] >>> >>>Most of the work on Ripple was a much needed feature we knew we needed >>>(Device Selection via query string [2]) as well as adding the ability to >>>serve content from multiple directories [3] (to support www/ merged with >>>platform/www/). >>> >>>Should I do the full remove serve and add this to emulate or merge this >>>in >>>as is? (maybe remove serve in the meantime) >>> >>>[1] - https://github.com/gtanner/cordova-cli/tree/ripple >>>[2] - >>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ripple.git;a=commitd >>>if >>>f;h=b36213d426700a3cc62b4701bc75806ff8539528 >>>[3] - >>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ripple.git;a=commitd >>>if >>>f;h=2e483836bc5a24397ed002556f4209fac9508438 >>> >>> >>>On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> >>>wrote: >>> >>>> Thats awesome ;) >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Gord Tanner <gtan...@gmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> > Yeah Michal, >>>> > >>>> > That is the exact use case I had in mind. When we were a startup we >>>> > couldn't afford mac's so just used linux and ripple for all our >>>>contract >>>> > work and borrowed a friends macbook when we needed to compile. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > Very interesting. Combined with Bradens proposal to support >>>>pointing >>>> to >>>> > a >>>> > > local platform, looks very good. >>>> > > >>>> > > Also note, offline isn't the only reason, platform support on a >>>>given >>>> > > machine as well: ie, can "test" iPhone (sorta) on a linux box >>>>through >>>> > > Ripple. >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > > omg I just realized this would fulfill offline use case vs lazy >>>>load >>>> > > > vendoring >>>> > > > >>>> > > > caching could be a future thing >>>> > > > >>>> > > > might be a really nice path >>>> > > > >>>> > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Gord Tanner >>>><gtan...@gmail.com> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > > > > +1 >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > With this I would want to add the ability to add a platform >>>>to a >>>> > > project >>>> > > > even if we don't have the build dependencies. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Emulate would just default to ripple so is still usable if we >>>>can't >>>> > > > build/deploy >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Sent from my iPhone >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > On 2013-03-22, at 1:55 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > >> I think this bleeds back into other discussions. It was >>>>mentioned >>>> in >>>> > > > >> the call earlier. I think some tacit agreement that ./serve >>>>goes >>>> > away >>>> > > > >> and Ripple is the default ./emulate command. But lets >>>>discuss. >>>> (Just >>>> > > > >> this. Lets keep thread focused.) >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> >>
