On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote:
> RE my last suggest about CLI command for plugin docs, I'm now thinking it > would be better to do something like we plan for tests: ship an app that > hosts the docs based on whichever plugins you have installed. Perhaps the > test app should even do both tasks? > I think it'd be fine to think about this as a do-later thing, but I don't want to get side-tracked just yet with these kinds of possibilities. > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Mike, actually I think with this proposal it should be easier than ever > to > > match plugin to docs specific to its version. > > > > The documentation would come bundled with the plugin, so you can find the > > README.md alongside wherever your plugin code resides, be that an old > > download, a plugman install, or from a git repo locally. > > > > Andrew, this all sounds pretty good, but looking forward to seeing > Michael > > Brooks/Brian chime in since I think they had a docs plan up their sleeve. > > > > Also, do we want to add a CLI command to show plugin docs? > > > > -Michal > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Mike Billau <mike.bil...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> >> 2. Move plugin information found in cordova-docs into a single > >> README.md > >> file within the respective plugin repos > >> And also remove the /cordova/ folder from cordova-docs, right? This way > >> there will be only one single location for a plugin's documentation (the > >> README.md file inside that plugin repo). > Right. The goal is one spot for plugin docs. > >> > >> What will we do for docs of older versions? If somebody is using 2.9, > they > >> will need the 2.9 README.md file - is it enough for them to just change > >> the > >> branch on github? > This change will not affect publish docs for older versions. for 2.9, you'd still go to docs.cordova.io's 2.9 documentation. > >> > >> Assuming that there is no problem with viewing older documentation, then > >> +1 > >> on all of these. > >> > > > > >