Jira is good for task and bug managment. ReviewBoard is just code review tool.
Both are complement. Send from my $60 smartphone ________________________________ De: jan i<mailto:j...@apache.org> Enviado: 3/23/2015 10:32 AM Para: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org<mailto:dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org> Asunto: Re: ReviewBoard On 23 March 2015 at 13:09, Franz de Copenhague < franzdecopenha...@outlook.com> wrote: > ReviewBoard is a very productive tool to review code and I have realized > that apache has this tool. https://reviews.apache.org/groups > > > > So far, I have learnt that each project has its corresponding group in > review board. I would like to use this tool to submit patches and code > change, and other developers can review them and discuss the changes and > provide feedbacks at coding level. > > > > I don't know who administrate reviewboard to request a new group for > Corinthia project. > I have an idea, let me check it. But I do think that Jira is a better tool, because we then have the history. I have no strong bias on reviewboard or jira, but I think we should only use one of them. What do others think? rgds jan I. > > > Juande > > > > > >
