I only have a mobile atm for inet access(with a very slow connection so things like Jira take years to load and the screen is tiny), so pardon the questions:
1. What does the review tool give us that Jira or the mailing list doesn't? 2. How would we use Jira together with the review tool? 3. I just realised I didn't close issues I resolved in Jira (will do once I have inet back) so I am wondering about the extra administrative overhead using the review board this would add, as in that we would have to keep 2 tools up to date and have 3 places to visit. Note I'm not against or for it, just not sure how to work this all :-) G On 23 Mar 2015 16:58, "Franz de Copenhague" <franzdecopenha...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > Having used many such tools I’ve come to like Jira, despite its flaws. > Also: it’s what others here (Apache) use. That’s not irrelevant, esp. if we > want to engage others within Apache. > > > > louis > > Again, JIRA and ReviewBoard are complementary tools and JIRA is on top of > ReviewBoard. Many apache projects are using both, for example: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Review+Board > > http://tajo.apache.org/review-request-tool.html > > franz
